The Murder of Roger Ackroyd by
Agatha Christie; Is not one of the best Mystery Novels
Few mystery lovers have formally
and informally asked me why the “The Murder of Roger Ackroyd “ has not been
mentioned among the other best mystery novels of all time on this blog and I
think I owe them a explanation. So here it goes.
Although “The Murder of Roger Ackroyd”
is considered one of the masterpieces of Agatha Christie and hailed by many
critics as a path breaking mystery novel that set new rules and standard for
mystery genre, I do not believe in this mass delusion that it is one of the
best mystery novels of all time because of the following reasons.
First of all there is only one
murder in the novel. Then there are too many red herrings; too much speculation
by different characters instead of solid detective work by the protagonist Hercule
Poirot who is supposed to be a good detective. However, few more murders are
revealed by the end of the novel but by that time novel runs out of the
entertainment juice.
Secondly, I don’t like the
character of Caroline Sheppard at all. Anyone
with a little bit of sense can spot that this character is totally fictitious.
The way she is able to gather information from the social vine about crimes and
hidden affairs of different people is completely unnatural and outright
childish.
If gathering information about
crimes or hidden secrets of people is so much easy as depicted in this novel
then perhaps government must disband the intelligence agencies like FBI or CIA
and recruit hawkers, milkmen, grocery store owners etc to combat crime and terrorism.
It is the good complex believable
characters that make a novel worth reading, not some meddling snoopy spinster
who spins too much yarn than she should.
Third, the plot is marred by too
many unrelated incidents; the story drags on needlessly and at times is boring.
The plot of a good mystery novel is supposed to be captivating; it keeps the
reader ensnared and compels him to keep on turning the pages. Unfortunately,
this is not the case with this novel. This would have been a better novel if
the unnecessary matter was chiseled out and the length was reduced by at least
thirty percent.
And last, the bizarre twist at
the end when the real killer is revealed and the absurd choice that Poirot gave
to the killer. Since I do not want to ruin anybody’s experience with the novel
I am refraining from giving any details but what Poirot did never made sense
and what antagonist did, did not make sense either.
Poirot
sardonically says to the killer, “It would be most unwise on your part to
attempt to silence me as you silenced M. Ackroyd. That kind of business does
not succeed against Hercule Poirot, you understand.” Why that kind of business
will not work with Poirot? Is he a god? The above cocky line made me so angry
that I wanted to jump into the novel and choke life out of Poirot with my bare
hands for wasting so much of my time.
The antagonist had already killed
other people, what was stopping him from trying to kill Poirot? Especially when
they were alone. If the antagonist had attacked Poirot and died during the confrontation
or even better had killed Poirot to elude law forever; then my views of the
novel could have been a little different but sadly, it is not so.
Therefore, the murder of Roger Ackryod
by Agatha Christie is just another mystery novel and it should not be counted
among the best mystery novels of all time.